The Victorian government must release Raw Data on C19 deaths to the public
Include age, gender, number of vaccine doses received, place of death (hospital ward, ICU, nursing home, home etc). Clarify any waiting period before vax status update & deaths “with” C19.
The Victorian government does not have a public disclosure log for Freedom of Information data released to the mainstream media.
From this article in The SMH, it appears that the media must have obtained monthly C19 deaths data segregated by: age, gender, vaccination doses & place of death (hospital ward, ICU, aged care, home etc).
The biased media article provides a very limited view of the raw data and draws twisted inferences from the data.
Interpretation of the data is grouped in such a way as to minimise the high rates of deaths occurring in the triple and quadruple jabbed elderly whilst inflating the low rates of deaths occurring in the unvaccinated cohort.
This twisted inference is then presented as a justification by the media to continue quadruple jabbing all the elderly and urging the rest of the people to get their third jab.
It appears that despite attributing a high number of total deaths to C19, the all cause mortality (considered per month) in Victoria is still high. And this is despite the fact that C19 deaths include deaths *with* C19 due to incidental C19 finding.
Why does the VIC government not have a public disclosure log for FOI info released to the media? Other states and federal government bodies such as the TGA & DoH do.
Why is the VIC government enabling the media act as a gatekeeper between the public & the government’s raw data which was released to the media under public disclosure?
Why is the VIC government restricting us to the parochial inferences drawn by the media?
The Victorian government must release the following information to the public:
Is there a waiting period after receiving a C19 jab prior to updating the vaccination status of a person?
For example, is there a 21 day waiting period after the 1st jab to consider a person as single jabbed, and 14 days waiting period after subsequent doses to be considered double, triple & quadruple jabbed?
Provide a monthly breakdown of C19 deaths data in VIC by age, gender, number of vaccine doses received and place of death (hospital ward, ICU, aged care, home).
Were any of the above deaths referred to the coroner?
Was a swab test for covid performed on any of these patients after their death?
Was an autopsy performed on any of the above patients?
What is the number of days after testing positive for C19 on a RAT or PCR is a person dying considered to have died *with* C19?
What is the monthly number of hospitalised patients who were reported as C19 deaths in whom C19 was merely an incidental finding? How many of such hospitalised patients have respiratory illness? Provide a breakdown of this data by age, gender, number of vaccine doses received.
All of the above questions must be clarified and the complete raw data must be made available to the public. Without transparency, there can be no accountability. If the authorities want to be trusted, then they need to be transparent with the public. Appointing specific media entities as gatekeepers between the public and the government does not inspire trust.
Kindly share this article on your social media and tag the VIC government Department of Health, Office of Victorian Information Commission, Victorian Chief Health Officer, Victorian Health Minister. Or send this to your elected official via Email or Post.
Thank you kindly for taking your time.
— The Solitary Reaper
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW!
Calling your Substack Newsletter, “The Solitary Reaper,” sounds like the most appropriate name you could have chosen. I will tell you why. It is because I found by searching the internet for organisations in Australia, which support the same kind of information you provide, I came up with zero results.
Yours is the single, solitary source of information exposing vaccine anomalies and abnormalities in Australia I’ve so far found.
There may be individuals on social media who try to expose things they believe are wrong with the way Covid vaccinations are being handled in this country, however, using the following Duck Duck Go search, "Australian organisations against covid vaccination,” I found nothing resembling the kind of service you provide. There were none that I could follow to gain more information from, to follow or to support - none!
Of the first 3 or 4 pages of my internet search results, I found they were predominantly from Government sources, all pushing their pro-vaccine messages. One result that differed only slightly, claimed to be a scientific group, prolifically quoting something they called “Reset Australia.”
This organisation has a diabolical “Big brother" agenda, which is to shut social media down and stop even the littlest of people from posting what they regard as “Anti-vaccination narratives"
"A new report by Reset Australia has found that the rise in vaccine hesitancy has coincided with a 280% increase in anti-vaxx group membership on Facebook"
"To help Australian public health authorities identify anti-vaccination narratives to inform community engagement responses, Reset Australia has developed a policy that would force social media companies to generate a ‘live list’ of the most popular COVID-19-related URLs shared on their platforms."
https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/online-australian-anti-vaxx-groups-grow-by-nearly
With regard to Julian Assange, wouldn’t you hate to be an Australian in any sort of strife in another country. I can’t say I’ve heard one of the elected gutless wonders in Canberra speak up for this poor beggar. They all seem too concerned about taking care of their own hides and that’s it, full stop! Talk about being hung out to dry - it is disgraceful what has happened this gutsy Australian Journalist.