They could have simply said they are agents of pharma companies, but why would they. They still pretend to be "independent". If they had responded to me instead of blocking me, many answers to earlier questions would have contradicted their answers to later questions. An example is the exclusion criteria for trials and them rolling out the jabs for the very groups excluded from trials. Much of this was revealed in documents procured via FOIA and they are on record. So the questions were framed to trap them. Another example is Aus govt TGA's pharmacovigilance issues.
Seriously they could have just answered with the truth - we just do what we are told/paid to do by pharmaceutical companies
They could have simply said they are agents of pharma companies, but why would they. They still pretend to be "independent". If they had responded to me instead of blocking me, many answers to earlier questions would have contradicted their answers to later questions. An example is the exclusion criteria for trials and them rolling out the jabs for the very groups excluded from trials. Much of this was revealed in documents procured via FOIA and they are on record. So the questions were framed to trap them. Another example is Aus govt TGA's pharmacovigilance issues.