Thanks bro. It was disappointing, to say the least, that a govt body would shut people down instead of being transparent. Things like this happen in third world countries and developing countries where people in power hold absolute authority over the commoners and common people like us fear retribution for even opening our mouths. It is unfortunate that first world countries and devloped nations are heading in that direction.
They could have simply said they are agents of pharma companies, but why would they. They still pretend to be "independent". If they had responded to me instead of blocking me, many answers to earlier questions would have contradicted their answers to later questions. An example is the exclusion criteria for trials and them rolling out the jabs for the very groups excluded from trials. Much of this was revealed in documents procured via FOIA and they are on record. So the questions were framed to trap them. Another example is Aus govt TGA's pharmacovigilance issues.
You cornered the rats 🐀 with those questions and they turned on you in the only arsenal they had and that was to block you.
Good questions 👍
Thanks bro. It was disappointing, to say the least, that a govt body would shut people down instead of being transparent. Things like this happen in third world countries and developing countries where people in power hold absolute authority over the commoners and common people like us fear retribution for even opening our mouths. It is unfortunate that first world countries and devloped nations are heading in that direction.
Seems to me they are the common questions any medical enquiry would be asked, it's astounding why the TGA would even block anyone 🤔
If TGA was transparent from the get go, I would not have had the need to ask them such basic questions.
Seriously they could have just answered with the truth - we just do what we are told/paid to do by pharmaceutical companies
They could have simply said they are agents of pharma companies, but why would they. They still pretend to be "independent". If they had responded to me instead of blocking me, many answers to earlier questions would have contradicted their answers to later questions. An example is the exclusion criteria for trials and them rolling out the jabs for the very groups excluded from trials. Much of this was revealed in documents procured via FOIA and they are on record. So the questions were framed to trap them. Another example is Aus govt TGA's pharmacovigilance issues.